The examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings is a key moment in the formation of declaratory evidence in the accusatory system outlined by the criminal procedure code, representing the privileged place of explication of the principles of orality, immediacy and contradictory, as well as the implementation of the right of defence..
The structure of the Vassalli Code gives the parties powerful levers in the fertile terrain of the government of oral criminal evidence (c.d. parts process), of which the so-called. cross examination which in the sector of declarative proof represents the Novum organum (orality, Like this, assume...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
With sentence no. 21241 of the 17 March 2022 (dep. 31 May 2022), the First Criminal Section of the Court of Cassation has offered important indications regarding the rules for evaluating circumstantial evidence, with particular reference to the so-called. “false alibi” and at the behest of the defendant Art..
Process suspension with probation is an alternative way of defining the process, activated from the preliminary investigation stage, through which it is possible to reach a ruling of acquittal for extinction of the crime, where the trial period you access...
Process suspension with probation is an alternative way of defining the process, activated from the preliminary investigation stage, through which it is possible to reach a ruling of acquittal for extinction of the crime, where the probationary period accessed by the suspect /...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
On the issue of test, the alibi failed to be considered as an element completely agnostic in terms of evidence and, therefore, which has not been even a hint; only in the case in which it was acquired aliunde proof of the responsibility it may constitute a supplementary element, of closing the evidentiary construct....